Re: includepath on NT

Fons Rademakers ((no email))
Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:19:09 +0200 (METDST)


What I am saying is that you ARE ALLOWED to include root/cint includes.
However, with the current version it does not work so you will need
the workaround of a private .h file. Next week when we release the next
1.03 update you will be able to include all the root/cint includes you
want.

Ciao, Fons.

>
> > ( ... )
> > like I said before this point is mood now since Masaharu has fixed
> > the problem. For the time being if you need some special defines
> > (const, defines, enums) from the root headers that are not in the
> > precompiled dictionaries just add them to a private .h file.
> > ( ... )
> Sorry, but fix of cint is not the point now.
> The point is : why am I NOT ALLOWED to include root/cint includes ?
> Could someone, please, answer this question.
> Extracting some "special defines" to a "private .h file" doesn't seem, for
> me, to be a good idea. With every new root release ( and they come every
> month, or so ) I would have to check all my "private .h files" against new
> root/cint includes, because maybe somwhere something was ( slighly, of
> course ) changed. I prefer to simply #include original .h files to escape
> of this problem. SO, WHY NOT ???
> Thanks in advance,
> Jacek.
>
>

-- 
Org:    CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
Mail:   1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland          Phone: +41 22 7679248
E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch              Fax:   +41 22 7677910