差分

このページの2つのバージョン間の差分を表示します。

この比較画面へのリンク

両方とも前のリビジョン前のリビジョン
次のリビジョン
前のリビジョン
research:memos:reduces_transition_probability [2020/03/28 20:38] – [Special cases] kobayashresearch:memos:reduces_transition_probability [2020/04/01 23:25] (現在) – [Reduced matrix element of the electric operator for wave functions in a spherically symmetric potential] kobayash
行 27: 行 27:
 where $Y^\lambda_\mu(\hat{\boldsymbol{r}})(=Y^\lambda_\mu(\theta, \varphi))$ is a spherical harmonics, $\hat{\boldsymbol{r}} where $Y^\lambda_\mu(\hat{\boldsymbol{r}})(=Y^\lambda_\mu(\theta, \varphi))$ is a spherical harmonics, $\hat{\boldsymbol{r}}
 $ is a unit vector, and $e$ is elementary charge. The $e_q$ are the electric charges for the proton ($q=p$) and neutron ($q=n$) in units of $e$. For example, for free nucleon, $e_p = 1$ for proton and $e_n=0$ for neutron (Brown's lecture note). $ is a unit vector, and $e$ is elementary charge. The $e_q$ are the electric charges for the proton ($q=p$) and neutron ($q=n$) in units of $e$. For example, for free nucleon, $e_p = 1$ for proton and $e_n=0$ for neutron (Brown's lecture note).
 +
 +==== Reduced matrix element of the electric operator for wave functions in a spherically symmetric potential  ====
 +From Bohr & Mottelson Vol. I, Eq. (3C-34),
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +B(E\lambda; j_1 \rightarrow j_2) = e^2 \frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi} \left\langle j_2 \left| r^\lambda \right| j_1 \right\rangle^2
 +\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} \lambda 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2.
 +\end{align}
 +
 +For the radial part of wave function $R_{nl}(r)$ in a spherically symmetric potential
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +R_{nl}(r)&=N_{nl}r^{l}e^{-\frac{1}{2}{2\nu}r^2}L_{n-1}^{l+\frac{1}{2}}({2\nu}r^2)\\
 +N_{nl} &= \sqrt{\frac{2(2\nu)^{l+3/2}(n-1)!}{\Gamma(n+l+1/2)}}\\
 +\nu &= \frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}\\
 +N &= 2(n-1)+l\\
 +E_{nl}&=\left(2(n-1)+l+\frac{3}{2}\right)\hbar\omega=\left(N+\frac{3}{2}\right)\hbar\omega\\
 +n &\in\mathbb{N},
 +\end{align}
 +
 +$\langle j_2 \left| r^\lambda \right| j_1 \rangle$ is
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +\langle j_2 \left| r^\lambda \right| j_1 \rangle
 +=&\ (-1)^{n_1+n_2}\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\frac{\lambda}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)!(n_2-1)!}{\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}}\\
 +&\times\Gamma\left(\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+3}{2}\right)
 +\sum_{k=0}^{\min(n_1-1,n_2-1)}\binom{\frac{-l_1+l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_1-k-1}\binom{\frac{l_1-l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_2-k-1}\binom{k+\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+1}{2}}{k}.
 +\end{align}
 +
 +Therefore,
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +B(E\lambda; j_1 \rightarrow j_2)
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} \lambda 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\left[(-1)^{n_1+n_2}\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\frac{\lambda}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)!(n_2-1)!}{\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}}\right.\\
 +& \left.\times\Gamma\left(\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+3}{2}\right)
 +\sum_{k=0}^{\min(n_1-1,n_2-1)}\binom{\frac{-l_1+l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_1-k-1}\binom{\frac{l_1-l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_2-k-1}\binom{k+\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+1}{2}}{k}\right]^2\\
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} \lambda 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\lambda}\frac{(n_1-1)!(n_2-1)!}{\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}\\
 +& \times\left[\Gamma\left(\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+3}{2}\right)
 +\sum_{k=0}^{\min(n_1-1,n_2-1)}\binom{\frac{-l_1+l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_1-k-1}\binom{\frac{l_1-l_2+\lambda}{2}}{n_2-k-1}\binom{k+\frac{l_1+l_2+\lambda+1}{2}}{k}\right]^2\\
 +\end{align}
 +
 +If $l_1+\lambda=l_2$,
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +\langle{j_2}\left|r^\lambda\right|{j_1}\rangle
 += (-1)^{n_1+n_2}\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\frac{l_2-l_1}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)!\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}{(n_2-1)!\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)}}
 +\binom{l_2-l_1}{n_1-n_2}.
 +\end{align}
 +
 +Therefore,
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +B(E\lambda; j_1 \rightarrow j_2)
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} \lambda 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\left[(-1)^{n_1+n_2}\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\frac{l_2-l_1}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)!\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}{(n_2-1)!\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)}}
 +\binom{l_2-l_1}{n_1-n_2}\right]^2\\
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} \lambda 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\left(\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\right)^{\lambda}\frac{(n_1-1)!\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}{(n_2-1)!\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)}
 +\binom{\lambda}{n_1-n_2}^2.
 +\end{align}
 +
 +
 +If $l_1+\lambda=l_2$ and $\lambda=1$,
 +
 +
 +\begin{align}
 +B(E\lambda; j_1 \rightarrow j_2)
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{2+1}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} 1 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{(n_1-1)!\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}{(n_2-1)!\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)}
 +\binom{1}{n_1-n_2}^2\\
 +=&\ e^2 \frac{3}{4\pi}\left\langle j_1 \frac{1}{2} 1 0 \left| j_2 \frac{1}{2}\right.\right\rangle^2
 +\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{(n_1-1)!\Gamma(n_2+l_2+1/2)}{(n_2-1)!\Gamma(n_1+l_1+1/2)}.
 +\end{align}
 +
 +
  
 ==== For wave functions in a spherically symmetric potential ==== ==== For wave functions in a spherically symmetric potential ====
行 374: 行 451:
  
 \begin{align} \begin{align}
-\binom{n}{k}=\frac{(-1)^k(n)_k}{k!}.+\binom{n}{k}=\frac{(-1)^k(-n)_k}{k!}.
 \end{align} \end{align}
 ([[https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%9D%E3%83%83%E3%83%9B%E3%83%8F%E3%83%9E%E3%83%BC%E8%A8%98%E5%8F%B7|Wikipedia - Pochhammer symbol (in Japanese)]] seems to be wrong.) ([[https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%9D%E3%83%83%E3%83%9B%E3%83%8F%E3%83%9E%E3%83%BC%E8%A8%98%E5%8F%B7|Wikipedia - Pochhammer symbol (in Japanese)]] seems to be wrong.)
research/memos/reduces_transition_probability.1585395488.txt.gz · 最終更新: 2020/03/28 20:38 by kobayash
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0