Re: includepath on NT
Jacek M. Holeczek (Jacek.Holeczek@Physik.uni-muenchen.de)
Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:45:56 +0200 (MET DST)
> ( ... )
> like I said before this point is mood now since Masaharu has fixed
> the problem. For the time being if you need some special defines
> (const, defines, enums) from the root headers that are not in the
> precompiled dictionaries just add them to a private .h file.
> ( ... )
Sorry, but fix of cint is not the point now.
The point is : why am I NOT ALLOWED to include root/cint includes ?
Could someone, please, answer this question.
Extracting some "special defines" to a "private .h file" doesn't seem, for
me, to be a good idea. With every new root release ( and they come every
month, or so ) I would have to check all my "private .h files" against new
root/cint includes, because maybe somwhere something was ( slighly, of
course ) changed. I prefer to simply #include original .h files to escape
of this problem. SO, WHY NOT ???
Thanks in advance,
Jacek.